What I find interesting, and possibly relevant, is the "conclusion" at the very end.
Perhaps the conflict is not between science and religion but between good and bad ways of doing both. In all of us there will always be a struggle between the craving for certainty, purity and closure and the acceptance of mystery, brokenness and provisionality. At their best, both scientists and people of faith are in a permanent state of awe-struck humility before the wonder and strangeness and messiness of things. At their worst, they are arrogant, dogmatic, and incurious. There's a bit of both in all of us, of course.
Now, if only those in both extremes of the debate would read and understand the article.
Zz.
1 comment:
Great article Zz!
Post a Comment