I gave this prompt to ChatGPT:
Sketch an object moving in a circular path, showing the tangential velocity at 4 different points along its path.
This was the image that it gave me:
I then gave what I thought a simpler prompt:
sketch an object moving in a circular path having a centripetal force
... and this was what I got:
I guess it is worth a giggle.
Zz.
The comments posted to this blog are MODERATED. All comments will require MY APPROVAL to be released, so please do NOT post multiple comments just because you do not see it appearing immediately!
All SPAM will never be approved for release in this blog, no matter how much you try to disguise it. CRACKPOTTERY and attempts at advertising your personal theory and website/blog will be treated in the same manner as unwanted SPAM.
I have a paid version of ChatGPT for work so I gave this a whirl. Mine was better than yours but was still wrong. When I told it that it was wrong and asked it to explain, it correctly explained the errors. It offered to redraw, and that one seems right, at least if you allow a little artistic license for the circle not actually being circular. Which, hey, I can't draw circles either.
ReplyDeleteI think that if I were to pay for such a service, I'd pay for Gemini because on average, it seems to produce more accurate images. However, they have recently moved that feature behind a paywall.
ReplyDeleteYeah, image generation is surprisingly poor, given that image search is not bad. My classic example of this is asking your favorite image generation tool to draw a benzene molecule with the six carbon atoms shown as black spheres and the six hydrogen atoms shown as red spheres. The paid (university-provided) versions of copilot and gemini can now do this. Six months ago both would have failed.
ReplyDelete