tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post3960755873323108865..comments2024-03-11T13:47:03.621-05:00Comments on Physics and Physicists: Why Antihydrogen and Antimatter Are DifferentZapperZhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15861398273820851809noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post-4018983536525823832009-05-06T16:50:00.000-05:002009-05-06T16:50:00.000-05:00No, it wasn't me, and I believe the article DID me...No, it wasn't me, and I believe the article DID meant to say "antiphoton", even though a photon is, via conventional understanding, its own antiparticle.<br /><br />I think they are just trying to keep all the "anti" together within the antimatter.<br /><br />Zz.ZapperZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15861398273820851809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post-27554269739017246562009-05-06T16:12:00.000-05:002009-05-06T16:12:00.000-05:00Antiphoton? Those can't exist, right?
I assume yo...Antiphoton? Those can't exist, right?<br /><br />I assume you meant antiproton.<br /><br />Lapsed PhysicistKurt Kohlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04627831550913918662noreply@blogger.com