tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post2358788735484761658..comments2024-03-11T13:47:03.621-05:00Comments on Physics and Physicists: Quantum Tunneling TimeZapperZhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15861398273820851809noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post-46478873459608094542017-07-31T08:36:40.170-05:002017-07-31T08:36:40.170-05:00Doug,
There certainly has been a lot of discussio...Doug,<br /><br />There certainly has been a lot of discussions on this, including the ones I posted back in 2006 by Winful and Buttiker/Washburn:<br /><br />http://physicsandphysicists.blogspot.com/2006/12/superluminal-tunneling.html<br /><br />Obviously, this will continue until this is settled.<br /><br />Zz.ZapperZhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15861398273820851809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34480619.post-40043859820317979342017-07-31T08:29:46.690-05:002017-07-31T08:29:46.690-05:00The tunneling time discussion goes waaaay back, to...The tunneling time discussion goes waaaay back, to people like Landauer. <a href="http://nanoscale.blogspot.com/2007/08/superluminality.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is a post about this from ten years ago (!!), and <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.66.217" rel="nofollow">here</a> is a link to Landauer and Martin's review (very pedagogical) about this from 1994 (!!!).Douglas Natelsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13340091255404229559noreply@blogger.com